Muse v. RETS Tech Center, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kevin Muse
Defendant: RETS Tech Center, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv03182
Filed: December 5, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: El Paso
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/30/2014. (jsmit)
April 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER Settlement Conference set for 6/12/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/2/2014. (evana, )
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER Setting Jury Trial for 7/7/2014 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/21/2014. (jsmit )
February 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER Setting Final Pretrial Conference for 3/21/2014 at 11:00 AM in Conference Room, proposed Final Pretrial Order, original only, shall be delivered in paper form directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on March 13, 2014, and lead counsel present in person, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/5/2014. (rpmcd)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER FOR JUDGMENT DISMISSING FIRST AND SECOND CLAIMS FOR RELIEF re 20 : judgment will enter dismissing the first and second claims for relief, alleging breach of contract and breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, respectively, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/8/2014. (rpmcd)
August 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER re 18 , by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/2/2013. (rpmcd )
July 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Setting Pretrial Conference for 8/21/2013 at 11:00 AM in Conference Room, Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4:00 p.m. 8/15/2013, and lead counsel present in person, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/11/2013. (rpmcd )
June 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Granting 13 Plaintiff's Motion to Request Call Records and Text Messages from AT&T, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/18/2013.(rpmcd )
December 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 1/18/2013 at 11:30 AM in Conference Room, proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on January 10, 2013, lead counsel present in person and no parties permitted, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/7/2012. (rpmcd)
December 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by NONE on October 9, 2012. (johar, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muse v. RETS Tech Center, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RETS Tech Center, Inc.
Represented By: Peter F. Munger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Muse
Represented By: Erin Casey Hogan
Represented By: Leah P. VanLandschoot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?