Ramos v. Astrue
Delores Ramos |
Michael J. Astrue |
SSA Noticing |
1:2012cv03213 |
December 10, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Arapahoe |
John L. Kane |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion for Attorney Fees, by Judge John L. Kane on 4/2/2014.(trlee, ) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting 19 Stipulated Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees. Defendant pay to Plaintiff, through counsel, reasonable attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $4,482.48. By Judge John L. Kane on 6/18/13.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 18 FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk, re: 17 Order. By Clerk on 5/29/13. (mnfsl, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting 16 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Remand. This civil action is remanded to Defendant for additional administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, consistent with the United States Supreme Court's decision in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993). By Judge John L. Kane on 5/28/13.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 11 Joint Case Management Plan. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 4/15/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 5/15/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 5/30/2013, by Judge John L. Kane on 2/28/13. (sgrim) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.