Elliott et al v. Thompson National Properties, LLC et al
Diane Elliott, Darrell S. Elliott and Darrell S. Elliott PSP |
Thompson National Properties, LLC, TNP 12% Notes Program, LLC, TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc. and Anthony W. Thompson |
1:2013cv00160 |
January 23, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Boyd N. Boland |
William J. Martinez |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 FINAL JUDGMENT. re: 77 by clerk on 5/19/2015. (dhans, ) |
Filing 77 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DAMAGES AND ATTORNEYS' FEES 75 , by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/18/2015.(dhans, ) |
Filing 73 ORDER Dismissing Claims and Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry for Default Judgment. Ordered that Defendants' Second Amended Answer (ECF No. 55) is hereby STRICKEN and the Clerk of Court is directed to enter Defendants default. Ordered t hat Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 70) is DENIED AS MOOT. Ordered that Plaintiffs shall submit their supported damages by affidavit on or before December 5, 2014. Ordered Plaintiffs may submit a motion for attorneys fees and costs, along with the appropriate supporting documentation, on or before December 5, 2014 by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/14/14.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 61 MINUTE ORDER granting in part 59 the Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 4/30/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 5/30/2014. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 7/29/2014. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/5/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/12/2013.(ervsl, ) |
Filing 58 ORDER granting 57 Defendants Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Party. Party Anthony W. Thompson is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All parties shall bear their own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/11/2013.(ervsl, ) |
Filing 53 ORDER Defendants Motions to Dismiss ECF Nos. 22 and 27 are DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiffs are DIRECTED to re-file their Further Amended Complaint, which was appended as an exhibit to their motion for leave to file an amended complaint ECF No. 42 . Plaintiffs are advised to carefully ensure that their re-filed Further Amended Complaint is fully consistent with Judge Boland's Recommendation Order ECF No. 51 , and the Courts Order adopting same. ECF No. 52 . Such filing is to be made no later than 5 p.m., November 20, 2013. by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/8/2013.(ervsl, ) |
Filing 52 ORDER adopting 51 Report and Recommendations and denying in part plaintiffs' opposed motion to amend complaint. by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/4/2013.(trlee, ) |
Filing 50 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland: Motion Hearing held on 5/8/2013. 42 Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Amend Complaint is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. FTR: BNB Courtroom A401. (bnbcd, ) |
Filing 12 ORDER Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference and Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Parties are directed to confer in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) on or before 03/21/13; The parties shall comply with mandatory disclosure requirements of Fed.R.Ci v.P. 26(a)(1) on or before 04/04/13; Proposed Scheduling Order due by 04/04/13; Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 4/11/2013 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 02/12/13. (alvsl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.