USA v. $19,712.00 in United States Currency
| USA |
| $19,712.00 in United States Currency |
| Dan Jensen |
| 1:2013cv00219 |
| January 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| William J. Martinez |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 38 Motion for Final Forfeiture of Property; THAT forfeiture of $16,712.00 of defendant $19,712.00 shall enter in favor of the United States; the United States shall have full and legal title to the defendant property, and may dispose of it in accordance with law and in accordance with the terms and provisions of the parties Settlement Agreement, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/13/2014.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
37
COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 12/16/2013 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. United States' Motion for Order Determining Potential Conflict of Interest 33 is GRANTED. The Court finds Mr. Willett is disqualified as counsel for claimant Dan Jensen due to his conflict of interest in representing Mr. Gerhardt in the criminal case. The disqualification of Mr. Willett shall be effective on January 6, 2014. FTR: S. Grimm. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 9/3/2013 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/26/13. (sgrim)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
