Wolf v. Suthers et al
| Wolf |
| Diane Marie Dash and John W. Suthers |
| 1:2013cv00234 |
| January 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 11 Order of Dismissal. (mjgsl, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER of Dismissal. ORDERED that the amended Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed (ECF No. 8 ) is granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed (ECF No. 3 ) is denied as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED tha t the motion to amend (ECF No. 9 ) is denied as unnecessary. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the amended Complaint (ECF No. 10 ) and the action are dismissed without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants John Suthers and Denver District Court and the claims asserted against them are dismissed with prejudice. It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that any pending motions are denied as moot. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/8/13.(mjgsl, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended in Forma Pauperis Motion and Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/12/2013. (skl)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/04/2013. (skl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
