GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC v. Infrastructure Corporation of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit Colorado District Court GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC v. Infrastructure Corporation of America

GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC v. Infrastructure Corporation of America

Plaintiff:	GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC
Defendant:	Infrastructure Corporation of America
Case Number:	1:2013cv00407
Filed:	February 14, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office:	Denver Office
County:	Denver
Presiding Judge:	Boyd N. Boland
Presiding Judge:	Philip A. Brimmer
Nature of Suit:	Copyright
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 6, 2013	Filing 22 ORDER. GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC's 18 Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Infrastructure Corporation of America is granted in part and denied in part. Judgment shall enter in favor of plaintiff GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC and against defend ant Infrastructure Corporation of America in the amount of $63,866.69 on GeoSpec's breach of contract claim. GeoSpec Systems, LLC's 19 Motion for Forthwith Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment is denied as moot. GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC's 21 Request for Status Conference is denied. GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC's 3 , 14 Motions for a Preliminary Injunction are denied as moot. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/6/13.(mnfsl, )
March 20, 2013	Filing 15 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 6/3/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, proposed Scheduling Order due by 5/28/13. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/20/13. (bnbcd, )

Date Filed

Document Text

August 6, 2013

Filing 22 ORDER. GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC's 18 Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Infrastructure Corporation of America is granted in part and denied in part. Judgment shall enter in favor of plaintiff GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC and against defend ant Infrastructure Corporation of America in the amount of $63,866.69 on GeoSpec's breach of contract claim. GeoSpec Systems, LLC's 19 Motion for Forthwith Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment is denied as moot. GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC's 21 Request for Status Conference is denied. GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC's 3 , 14 Motions for a Preliminary Injunction are denied as moot. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/6/13.(mnfsl, )

March 20, 2013

Filing 15 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 6/3/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, proposed Scheduling Order due by 5/28/13. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/20/13. (bnbcd, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC v. Infrastructure Corporation of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: GeoSpec1 Systems, LLC
Represented By:	Jessie Laura Pellant
Represented By:	Donald Earl Lake, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Infrastructure Corporation of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?