Havens v. Clements et al
Darrell Havens |
Tom Clements, Physicians Healthcare Partners and Colorado Department of Corrections |
1:2013cv00452 |
February 20, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Boyd N. Boland |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 136 JUDGMENT in favor of defendants and against plaintiff Darrell Havens re: 133 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, 134 Order, 132 Order to Show Cause,, 135 Order, by Clerk on 10/1/15. Civil Case Terminated. (pglov) |
Filing 116 MINUTE ORDER granting 114 Unopposed Motion to Modify the Schedul[ing] Order with Respect to Deadlines by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/1/14. Discovery is due by 12/17/2014 and Dispositive Motions are due by 1/29/2015. (dkals, ) |
Filing 113 MINUTE ORDER granting 111 Motion to Modify the Schedul[ing] Order with Respect to Deadlines for Expert Witness Disclosures by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/19/14.(dkals, ) |
Filing 110 MINUTE ORDER granting 105 Unopposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order with Respect to Deadlines and 106 Motion to Supplement Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/7/14. Discovery is due by 11/17/2014 and Dispositive Motions are due by 12/29/2014 (dkals, ) |
Filing 104 MINUTE ORDER granting 102 Unopposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order with Respect to Deadlines for Expert Witness Disclosures by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/22/14. Discovery is due by 10/3/2014. (dkals, ) |
Filing 97 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER - CIVIL by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 5/13/14. (msksec, ) |
Filing 81 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS: Mr. Havens' Objections (#61) are overruled, and the Recommendation 60 is ADOPTED. The Motion to Dismiss 39 filed by Defendan ts Rick Raemisch, Carmen Meyer, Hermella Assefa, Wonda Jacobs, Emmanuel Okai, and Jamie Harrelson is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted with respect to all claims against Defendants Raemisch, Meyer, Hermella, Assefa, Ja cobs, and Okai, except for the following: (1) §1983 claim for violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendant Raemisch in his official capacity; (2) § 1983 claims for violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Assefa, Jacobs, and Okai, in their individual capacities. Because Mr. Havens has been previously given the opportunity to amend his complaint, the Court does not reflexively grant him leave to amend. However, if Mr. Havens believes that he can cure the pleading d eficiencies identified here, within 21 days he may file an appropriate motion seeking leave to amend, tendering a proposed amended pleading that clearly indicates the material that is allegedly sufficient to overocme the pleading deficiencies. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/24/14.(msksec, ) |
Filing 78 MINUTE ORDER granting in part, denying in part, and denying without prejudice in part 76 Plaintiff's Motion to Produce Requested Documents & Seek that Added [sic] Defendants on this Case, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/20/2014. (cpear) |
Filing 75 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION: Mr. Havens' Motion for Reconsideration of Dismissal and Order Denver Reception & Diagnostic Center to Preserve All Video Survellance [sic] Cameras/Documents 17 is DENIED. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/18/14.(msksec, ) |
Filing 73 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 71 Plaintiff's Motion to Motify [sic] Additional Defendants & Appoint Council [sic], by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/3/2014. (mehcd) |
Filing 70 MINUTE ORDER denying 68 Motion to Have a Forthwith Hearing and Leave to Motify [sic] Additional Defendants. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/27/2014.(klyon, ) |
Filing 53 ORDER granting 51 Motion to Stay. The proceedings of this case are hereby stayed pending the District Court=s ruling on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 10/24/2013 is vacated. The parties are directed to submit a status report within five days of the entry of any order adjudicating the pending Motions to Dismiss. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/30/2013.(klyon, ) |
Filing 46 MINUTE ORDER denying as premature 37 Supplemental Motion to Defendant PHP's Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice and Request an Order for DRDC Keeps [sic] All Video Camera Recordings. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/5/2013.(klyon, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw in Part. ORDERED that the Complaint and claims as specifically stated above against Defendants Tom Clements, Physicians Healthcare Partners, Carmen Meyers, Hermella Assefa, Kimberly Boydin, Wonda Jacobs, Emma nuel Okai, and Jaime Harrelson shall be assigned to Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1C.1 and to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegerty. Defendants Ronald Alires, Brian McFee, Brian Hoffman, Sandy Harris, Dona Zavislan, Ra y Chavez, M. J. Wooden, Mr. Opperman, Mr. Thompson, Sgt. Brandon Simons, Mrs. Gray, Mrs. Harrison, Colorado Department of Corrections, and State of Colorado and the claims asserted against them are dismissed with prejudice. Defendants Mr. Perry, Mr. Harris, Mr. Ferguson, Heather Bailey, and Offender Care Aides are dismissed without prejudice, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/18/13. (sgrim) |
Filing 5 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/01/2013. (skl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.