Marshall v. Exelis Systems Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Rashanna Marshall
Defendant: Exelis Systems Corporation, Exelis, Inc. and Lawrence Lindloff
Case Number: 1:2013cv00545
Filed: March 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Christine M. Arguello
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 154 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 78 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 79 Motion for Summary Judgment. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 03/26/2015. (athom, )
August 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER re 47 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant Exelis Systems Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Outrageous Conduct Claims (Doc. # 47 ) is DENIED IN PART with respect to its arguments regarding Plaintiff's outrageous conduct claim. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 08/26/2014. (athom, )
March 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER granting 44 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Claims Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and granting in part 47 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Outrageous Conduct Claims, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/24/14.(dkals, )
August 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/9/13. (sgrim)
June 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MINUTE ORDER granting 23 Partially Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and Jury Demand by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/7/13.(dkals, )
March 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 6/4/2013 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/8/2013. (kmtcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marshall v. Exelis Systems Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rashanna Marshall
Represented By: Jessica Eve Jones
Represented By: Darold W. Killmer
Represented By: Mari Anne Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exelis Systems Corporation
Represented By: Elizabeth B. Chilcoat
Represented By: Glenn H. Schlabs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exelis, Inc.
Represented By: Elizabeth B. Chilcoat
Represented By: Glenn H. Schlabs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lawrence Lindloff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?