Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1-4
| Elf-Man, LLC |
| John Does 1-4 |
| 1:2013cv00686 |
| March 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| R. Brooke Jackson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 64 Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Entry of Default Judgment against Defendant William Hall, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/8/2014. (cpear)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER granting 62 Elf-Man, LLC and Joseph Tincknells Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Defendant Tincknell With Prejudice Pursuant To Fed. R.Civ. P. 41(a)(1) (A)(ii). Party Joseph Tincknell is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this action, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 2/20/2014.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
61
MINUTE ORDER granting 59 Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference set for 2/20/2014 is vacated. Dismissal papers due by 2/21/2014. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/7/2014. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
49
MINUTE ORDER granting 47 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Second Amended Complaint and Case Caption by Interlineation. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Corrected Second Amended Complaint located at docket [47-1]. Plaintiff shall serve the Defendants in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and all applicable rules. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/30/2013. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
45
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend First Amended Complaint in Order to Identify Defendant John Doe 3 by Name 43 is granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant William Hall 41 , which relies on the content and service of the First Amended Complaint, is denied without prejudice as moot by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/29/13.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
21
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot the following motions: 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File and Serve First Amended Complaint Naming Doe Number 1, and 19 Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Leave to File and Serve First Amended Complaint Naming Doe Number 1. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/19/2013. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
10
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Status Conference held on 5/2/2013, denying without prejudice 3 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Limited Expedited Discovery Prior to Rule26(f) Conference. FTR: C. Pearson - Courtroom A-501. (mehcd) Modified on 5/2/2013 to correct text (mehcd).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1-4 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Does 1-4 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elf-Man, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David John Stephenson, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
