Myers et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Walter Myers, Katherine Myers, Amanda Weakland and Patrick Weakland |
Bureau of Land Management |
1:2013cv00701 |
March 18, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Boyd N. Boland |
William J. Martinez |
Environmental Matters |
33.1301 Clean Water Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 148 ORDER denying as moot 141 Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney Fees, Expert Witness Fees, and Litigation Expenses and closing this case. Judgment shall enter in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant Bureau of Land Management with respect to the Clean Water Act claim. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/7/2016. (cpear) |
Filing 125 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion for Summary Judgment as outlined in the attached order. The parties are to submit a joint-status report to the Court within fourteen days of entry of this Order as to what remains of Plaintiffs ' Complaint (ECF No. 1) to be decided at a trial; ORDERS BLM, within thirty days of entry of this Order, to submit a report to the Court detailing its progress on finishing of the New Well and closing the Old Well; and ORDERS BLM, within thirty days of entry of this Order, to submit a report to the Court detailing the status of its NPDES permit application for the Old and New Wells. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/13/2015.(tscha, ) |
Filing 121 ORDER Setting Case for Trial. This matter has been scheduled for a four-day trial to the court on the docket of Judge Raymond P. Moore in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A601, 6th Floor, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on 10/26/2015 at 9:00 a.m. A Trial Preparation Conference is set for 10/2/2015 at 09:00 a.m. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/25/2014. (athom, ) |
Filing 114 ORDER setting case for trial. Trial Preparation Conference set for 2/2/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 601 before Judge Raymond P. Moore. A four day Bench Trial is set to commence on 3/2/2015 09:00 AM before Judge Raymond P. Moore. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/2/2014. (trlee, ) |
Filing 108 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 84 Report and Recommendations. by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 55/2014.(trlee, ) |
Filing 71 ORDER re: 70 Scheduling Conference, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/17/2013. (trlee, ) |
Filing 49 ORDER granting 42 Motion to Intervene. Answer is accepted as filed. by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/7/2013.(trlee, ) |
Filing 41 ORDER LIFTING STAY: ORDERED that Defendant's response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 37) is due within 21 days of the date of this Order, and Plaintiffs reply is due within 14 days after service of Defendants response; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to contact Magistrate Judge Boland to reset discovery or other dates in the Scheduling Order necessitated by the October 1, 2013 stay order. by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 10/22/2013. (trlee, ) |
Filing 40 ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion for Stay (ECF No. 39 ). By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 10/01/13. (alvsl) |
Filing 27 MINUTE ORDER denying as withdrawn 12 Motion for Partial Dismissal of the Complaint by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/12/13.(dkals, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 6/5/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, proposed scheduling order due by 5/29/13. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/29/13. (bnbcd, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.