Ahava Ministries v. Pine River Irrigation District
||Pine River Irrigation District
||March 29, 2013
||Colorado District Court
||Marcia S. Krieger
||Craig B. Shaffer
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||42:2000cc Religious Land Use & Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 31, 2013
OPINION AND ORDER denying motion for temporary restraining order: The Court DENIES that portion of the Plaintiff's motion 22 that requests a temporary restraining order under Rule 65(b). For purposes of the Plaintiff's request for a preli minary injunction, the Court finds it appropriate to refer to the matter to the Magistrate Judge to conduct an evidentiary hearing and make recommendations for the disposition of that aspect of the Plaintiff's motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 67; 636(b)(1)(B). The parties shall jointly contact the Magistrate Judge's chambers at their earliest possible opportunity to schedule such a hearing. The Defendant shall file a written response to the motion for preliminary injunction at leas t 7 days prior to the date of the hearing or on such earlier date as the Magistrate Judge may direct. The Plaintiff's motion requesting that any evidentiary preliminary injunction hearing be conducted by the Magistrate Judge 25 is GRANTED. By Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 5/31/13.(msklc2, )
|May 3, 2013
ORDER setting a Scheduling Conference on 6/12/2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 5/3/13. (cbssec)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?