Brilliant Optical Solutions, LLC v. Comcast Corporation
Plaintiff: Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC
Defendant: Comcast Corporation
Case Number: 1:2013cv00886
Filed: April 5, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 138 ORDER from United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, dismissing 130 Notice of Appeal filed by, Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC. (mlace, )
March 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 127 JUDGMENT by Clerk: re: 125 Order on Motion for Award of Attorney Fees and Costs. By Clerk on 3/27/15. (kfinn)
May 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 69 MINUTE ORDER: # 48 (Motion) Restricted Document - Level 1 and # 59 Motion for Attorney Fees, to Declare Case Exceptional and Request for Hearing - Redacted Public Version, are DENIED as moot, due to the filing of # 67 (Motion) Restricted Document - Level 1. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/15/2014.(klyon, )
April 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Unopposed Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice [# 43 ] filed April 16, 2014, is GRANTED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/16/2014. (klyon, )
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER Concerning Appointment of Special Master. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/18/2014. (klyon, )
February 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER Vacating Markman Hearing. The Markman hearing currently set Friday,February 7, 2014, at 9:00 a.m., is VACATED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/3/2014. (klyon, )
January 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 AMENDED ORDER. Ordered that Comcast Cable Communications, LLC is SUBSTITUTED for defendant, Comcast Corporation. Ordered that plaintiff's claims against defendant, Comcast Corporation, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that henceforth Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, SHALL BE NAMED in the caption as the defendant by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 01/16/14. (jjhsl, )
November 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER setting Markman Hearing for 2/7/2014 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/13/2013. (klyon, )
November 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MINUTE ORDER granting 25 Defendant Comcast Corporation's MotionFor Leave to File a Surreply to Plaintiff's Responsive Claim Construction Brief(Dkt. 23). By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/12/2013.(klyon, )
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER of Recusal. By Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 5/1/2013. (klyon, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brilliant Optical Solutions, LLC v. Comcast Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brilliant Optical Solutions LLC
Represented By: Paul Alan Lesko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Comcast Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?