Rapp v. Hoffman et al
| Doris Rapp |
| Karin Hoffman and Tendril Press, LLC |
| 1:2013cv00908 |
| April 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Raymond P. Moore |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER Granting 85 Unopposed Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice. DENIES as MOOT 79 motion to dismiss. Each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, except as otherwise may have been agreed to by the parties in their confidential settlement agreement. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 08/04/2015. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/2/14 re: Motion to Amend Scheduling Order 71 . The Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as specified; and The case schedule is modified to the following extend: Discovery cut-off: 3/2/2015. Dispositive motion deadline: 3/2/2015. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/9/14 re: Motion to Withdraw and Amend Admissions 55 . The Motion is GRANTED; and Ms. Hoffman shall serve a written answer to the Requests, on or before 10/20/2014. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/6/14 re: Unopposed Motion by Plaintiff to Reopen Discovery and Modify Scheduling Order 64 . The Motion is GRANTED as specified. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/3/14. The Motion for Default Judgment 43 is DENIED insofar as it seeks the entry of default judgment as a sanction for failure to make disclosures and discovery as required, andGRANTED insofar as it may be construed as a motion to compel discovery. Ms. Hoffman shall make full disclosures and discovery responses that comply with the formalities of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on or before June 17, 2014. A Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/6/2014 02:30 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. A Final Pretrial Order shall be prepared by the parties and submitted to the court no later than July 30, 2014. (bsimm)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/17/14. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b) and (c) 37 is DENIED without prejudice for failure to comply with the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a). (bsimm)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER: Proposed scheduling orders refused. Parties are to submit a revised proposed Scheduling Order by 7/22/13, incorporating dates outlined by the Court. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/12/13. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER re: 20 Answer to Complaint filed by Tendril Press, LLC, Karin Hoffman. IT IS ORDERED: (1) The Answer, insofar as it purports to be on behalf of Tendril Press, is STRICKEN; and (2) The case is set for a scheduling conference on July 1 2, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall prepare a proposed scheduling order and submit it to the court no later than July 5, 2013. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 06/18/13. (alvsl)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER: 15 Motion to Strike is DENIED; 12 Defendant Karin Hoffmans Motion for Extention [sic] of Time is GRANTED to allow the defendants until June 17, 2013, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint and is DENIED in all other respects. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/7/13.(bnbcd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
