Adema Technologies, Inc v. Eiffert et al
Adema Technologies, Inc |
Patricia Eiffert and Imaginit, Inc. |
1:2013cv01139 |
April 29, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Christine M. Arguello |
Boyd N. Boland |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Conversion |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 129 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant Patrina Eiffert and against Plaintiff Adema Technologies, Inc by Clerk on 9/9/215. (vbarn) |
Filing 117 ORDER denying 75 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claims based on alter ego against both ImaginIt and Dr. Eiffert are DISMISSED with prejudice. All claims against ImaginIt Inc. are DISMISSED with prejudice. As a result of this ruling, the only counts remaining for trial by a jury are Counts 1 and 2 as against Defendant Patrina Eiffert. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 08/04/2015. (athom, ) |
Filing 109 ORDER. By no later than 6/6/2015, the parties are to file simultaneous briefing addressing the three prongs set forth above with evidentiary and legal support for the argument as to whether or not it is appropriate for this Court to pierce the corp orate veil, i.e., whether SFW is an alter ego of ImaginIt and whether Imaginit is an alter ego of Ms. Eiffert. The Final Trial Preparation Conference set for 5/11/2015 at 1:00 PM, and the Trial beginning on 5/26/2015, are VACATED. Parties are DIRECTED to email Chambers (arguello_chambers@cod.uscourts.gov) on or before 6/8/2015, to reset trial dates. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 05/07/2015. (athom, ) |
Filing 96 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 91 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 04/23/2015. (athom, ) |
Filing 90 ORDER. It is ORDERED that Defendants file a Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment within 14 days of this Order. Plaintiff shall have 7 days following Defendants' Response to file its Reply. Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Motion (Doc. # 76 ) is DENIED. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 04/15/2015. (athom, ) |
Filing 73 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/10/14 granting 71 Motion for Leave to Participate by Telephone in the Pre-Trial Conference. (bsimm, ) |
Filing 67 ORDER denying 63 Motion to Strike. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing the defendants' Answer [Doc. # 62 ]. Discovery due by 10/31/2014. The Final Pretrial Conference set 10/1/2014, at 10:00 AM, isVACATED and RESET to 11/13/2014 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. A Final Pretrial Order shall be prepared by the parties and submitted to the court no later than 11/62014. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/16/2014. (athom, ) |
Filing 58 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/10/14. Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of Time to Complete Discovery 29 is GRANTED. The Motion to Comple 30 is DENIED as moot. The Motion to Withdraw 34 is DENIED as withdrawn. (bsimm) |
Filing 52 ORDER Adopting in Part and Rejecting in Part 46 Report and Recommendations, and denying 8 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Verified Complaint or, in the Alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 3/19/14.(dkals, ) |
Filing 38 PROTECTIVE ORDER. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/2/14. (mnfsl, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 7/22/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, proposed scheduling order due by 7/15/13. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/10/13. (bnbcd, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.