Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 115, 116, 117, 119, 121, 123, 124, 125, 127, 128, 129, 130, 133, 137, 139, 140, 144, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153, 154 and 155
| Purzel Video GmbH |
| Does 115, 116, 117, 119, 121, 123, 124, 125, 127, 128, 129, 130, 133, 137, 139, 140, 144, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153, 154 and 155 |
| 1:2013cv01171 |
| May 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER DISMISSING CASE With Prejudice by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 01/27/14. (jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
56
Amended 54 Order Affirming and Adopting Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 01/06/14. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
45
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 42 Plaintiff's Motion and Memorandum for Default Judgment against Defendant James Warren, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/12/2013. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER In accordance with the Notice of Dismissal of Chad Peterson Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) filed on October 8, 2013 ECF No. 31 , it is ORDERED that Defendant Chad Peterson is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and shall hereafter be taken off the caption, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/8/2013. (ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER. ORDERED that Defendant Doe Nos. 115, 121, 127, 139, 147, and 154 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Doe Nos. 119, 124, 125, 148, and 150 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/06/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER. ORDERED that Defendant Doe No. 129 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and shall hereafter be taken off the caption by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 07/18/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 4 Plaintiff's Motion and Memorandum for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/7/2013. (mehcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 115, 116, 117, 119, 121, 123, 124, 125, 127, 128, 129, 130, 133, 137, 139, 140, 144, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153, 154 and 155 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Purzel Video GmbH | |
| Represented By: | Paul Alan Lesko |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Does 115, 116, 117, 119, 121, 123, 124, 125, 127, 128, 129, 130, 133, 137, 139, 140, 144, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153, 154 and 155 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
