Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 75, 78, 83, 84, 89, 90, 91, 100, 109, 110, 118, 122, 126, 131, 132, 134, 141, 142 and 145
| Purzel Video GmbH |
| Does 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 75, 78, 83, 89, 90, 91, 100, 109, 110, 118, 122, 126, 131, 132, 134, 141, 142 and 145 |
| 1:2013cv01172 |
| May 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge dated April 23, 2014 ECF No. 77 is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. In accordance therewith, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion and Memorandum for Default Judgment Against Defendant Donald Biby ECF No. 73 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; namely, it is granted as to the request for a default judgment and for damages, and granted in part and denied in part as to the request for injunctive relief. it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in Plaintiffs favor against Defendant Donald Biby for direct copyright infringement of Plaintiffs copyrighted work as set forth in Count I of the Amended Complaint, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 5/16/2014.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER Affirming and Adopting Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 65 is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. ORDERED that Plaintiffs Amended Motion and Memorandum for Default Judgment Against Defendant Jesus Sanchez (ECF No. 62) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 01/06/14.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER. ORDERED that Defendant Bill Yates is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and shall hereafter be taken off the caption by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/29/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
61
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 58 Plaintiff's Motion and Memorandum for Default Judgment against Defendant Jesus Sanchez, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/12/2013. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Dismissal of Does Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(A)(1)(A)(i) filed on August 14, 2013 (ECF No. 36) is MOOT by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/14/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER. ORDERED that Doe No. 110 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Doe No. 122 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/06/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER. ORDERED that Doe No. 84 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Doe Nos. 67, 132, 141, and 142 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. These Defendants shall hereafter be taken off the caption by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 07/18/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER. ORDERED that Doe Nos. 90 and 131 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and shall hereafter be taken off the caption by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 07/01/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 05/06/13.(jjhsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Purzel Video GmbH v. Does 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 75, 78, 83, 84, 89, 90, 91, 100, 109, 110, 118, 122, 126, 131, 132, 134, 141, 142 and 145 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Purzel Video GmbH | |
| Represented By: | Paul Alan Lesko |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Does 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 73, 75, 78, 83, 89, 90, 91, 100, 109, 110, 118, 122, 126, 131, 132, 134, 141, 142 and 145 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
