Simmons v. Trani et al
| Leo Simmons |
| John Suthers and Travis Trani |
| 1:2013cv01273 |
| May 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/4/13. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER to File Preliminary Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/11/2013. (skl)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying 9 Motion Requesting an Injunction Relief and 18 Motion for Extraordinary Writ by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/6/13.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; denying as premature 13 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying as moot 14 Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis re 15 Notice of Appeal ;and terminating 21 Motion for Order, which is construed as a Notice, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/02/13.(nmmsl, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER denying 6 Motion Requesting a Restraining Order or Temporary Restraining Order by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 6/10/13.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/16/2013. (skl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
