Watson v. Cozza-Rhodes et al
| Pierre Terron-O'neal Watson |
| Jeff George, Ed Vincent, Dan Clark, T. K. Cozza-Rhodes, Romine and Miranda Avalos |
| 1:2013cv01456 |
| June 5, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
Final JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 43 Order, by Clerk on 4/11/2014. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Accepting 39 Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. Defendants George, Cozza-Rhodes and Avalos's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies [Docket No. 33 ] is GRANTED, and the claims against defendants George, Cozza-Rhodes, and Avalos are dismissed without prejudice. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/10/2014.(klyon, )
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 2/24/2014 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/19/2013. (mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/13/13. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
9
SECOND ORDER Directing Plaintiff To Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 06/27/13. (nmmsl, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/12/13. (bnbcd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
