Jenkins v. U.S. Government Intelligence Agents et al
| Bobby Jack Jenkins |
| Mark C. Anzman, Timothy W. Gist, Nancy D. Freudenthal, Governor of Wyoming, Matt Mead, Jeff Graham, Social Security Administration, Air Force, U.S. Government Intelligence Agents, State of Wyoming Worker Compensation, Cheyenne Wyoming, USDA HUD and Housing Department of the State of Wyoming |
| 1:2013cv01488 |
| June 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying without prejudice leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/2/13. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
14
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 07/09/13 DENYING 13 Motion: Retaliation Against Rights, because it is not clear what relief Plaintiff is seeking. (nmmsl, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER denying 11 Motion Injunction and a Restraining Order by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 7/8/13.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Directing Plaintiff To File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/27/13. (nmmsl, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 06/11/13. (nmmsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
