Denison v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Jeremy Nechol Denison
Defendant: Colorado Department of Corrections, Correctional Health Partners, Jill Lampela, Neal Lousberg, Richard Hodge, Mark Wienpal, Kathleen Boyd, Anthony DeCesaro and Joseph Wright
Case Number: 1:2013cv01584
Filed: June 17, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Fremont
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/26/15. ORDERED: The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 125 is ACCEPTED. ORDERED: Defendant Correctional Health Partners' Motion for Summary Judgment 101 is GRANTED. ORDERED: Defendants Nea l Lousberg and Kathleen Boyd's Motion for Summary Judgment 103 is GRANTED. ORDERED: Within 14 days of the entry of judgment, defendants may have their costs by filing a bill of costs with the Clerk of the Court. ORDERED: This case is dismissed in its entirety. (kpreu)
March 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 126 MINUTE ORDER denying 123 Joint Motion to Strike, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/19/2015.(agarc, )
December 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 108 MINUTE ORDER granting 104 Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limitations on Motion for Summary Judgment by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/09/14.(jhawk, )
November 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 93 MINUTE ORDER granting 91 Motion for Extension of Dispositive Motion Deadline. Dispositive Motions due by 12/5/2014. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/3/2015 09:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/12/2014.(agarc, )
November 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER. ORDERED that plaintiff Jeremy Nechol Denison may send an initial written settlement offer to defendants on or before November 20, 2014. ORDERED that, on or before December 1, 2014, defendants shall notify the Court whether they are willing t o participate in a settlement conference with the assigned magistrate judge. ORDERED that the Court will not rule on plaintiffs Motion Requesting Order for Settlement Hearing [Docket No. 86] until on or after December 1, 2014 by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/07/14. (jhawk, )
October 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 85 MINUTE ORDER granting 83 Motion for Extension of Discovery Cutoff for the Limited Purpose of Deposing Plaintiff by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/09/14.(jhawk, )
May 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 71 AMENDED ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 68 is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall select an attorney by first determining whether an attorney has previously represented the Plaintiff, and if not, by selecting an appropriate attorney from the Civil Pro Bono Panel to represent the Plaintiff in this case by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 05/12/14. (jhawk, )
April 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER Accepting Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. Ordered that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 59 is ACCEPTED. Ordered that the Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(B)(1) and (6) by Defendants Boyd, Hodge, Lampela, Lousberg, Wienpahl, and Wright 49 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 04/28/14.(jhawk, )
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MINUTE ORDER granting 60 Defendants' Motion to Conduct Deposition of Incarcerated Inmate Plaintiff. Defendants may take the deposition of inmate Plaintiff Jeremy Denison. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/4/2014. (cpear)
January 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MINUTE ORDER granting 39 Defendant Wright's Request [Motion] to Join Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. Defendant Wright shall file an answer or other response to the Complaint on or before February 3, 2014. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/17/14.(mnfsl, )
August 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw in Part to District Judge and Magistrate Judge. ORDERED that Defendants Colorado Department of Corrections and Anthony DeCesaro are dismissed as improper parties to this action. The Complaint as asserted against remaining Defendants shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/15/13. (sgrim)
June 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Plaintiff To Cure Deficiency, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 06/18/13. (nmmsl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Denison v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeremy Nechol Denison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colorado Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Health Partners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jill Lampela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neal Lousberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Hodge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Wienpal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathleen Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony DeCesaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?