TCYK, LLC v. Does 1-20
| TCYK, LLC |
| John Does 1-20 |
| 1:2013cv01630 |
| June 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER. ORDERED that Defendant Ahmed Zarrouk and this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/30/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
44
MINUTE ORDER granting 41 Motion to Amend Complaint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Corrected Second Amended Complaint, located at docket #41-2, as well as Exhibits A, B and C, located at dockets ## 41-3, 41-4, and 41-5. The Court's December 12, 2013 order directing the Clerk of the Court to file the Second Amended Complaint (docket #37) is withdrawn by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/17/13.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
39
MINUTE ORDER granting 37 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint in order to Identify Defendant John Doe 13 by Name. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Second Amended Complaint, located at docket [37-3], as well as Exhibit s A, B and C, located at dockets [37-4], [37-5], and [37-6]. Plaintiff shall serve the Defendant with the Second Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and this Court's orders. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/12/2013. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER. ORDERED that John Does 1, 2, 4, 8, 14, 15, 18 and 20 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and shall hereafter be taken off the caption by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/11/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER. ORDERED that John Doe 11 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and shall hereafter be taken off the caption by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/25/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER. ORDERED that John Does 3, 7, 10, and 17 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and shall hereafter be taken off the caption by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/17/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER. ORDERED John Doe No. 5 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and shall hereafter be taken off the caption by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 09/13/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER. ORDERED John Doe No. 9 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and shall hereafter be taken off the caption by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 09/04/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER granting 8 Motion for Leave to Take Limited Expedited Discovery Priorto Rule 26(f) Conference by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 06/24/13.(jjhsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TCYK, LLC v. Does 1-20 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Does 1-20 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TCYK, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David John Stephenson, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
