Electronic Packaging Solutions, Inc. et al v. Dickstein Shapiro, LLP
Plaintiff: David Stark, Eversealed Windows, Inc. and Electronic Packaging Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: Dickstein Shapiro, LLP
Case Number: 1:2013cv01636
Filed: June 21, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Stipulated Motion For Dismissal With Prejudice [# 71 ] filed May 5, 2014, is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/5/2014. (klyon, )
March 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER denying Defendant's 14 Motion to Transfer Venue. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/6/2014.(klyon, )
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MINUTE ORDER granting 29 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiffs proposed Amended Complaint [29-1], by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/15/13.(sgrim) Modified on 11/15/2013 to correct linkage (klyon, ).
September 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: Proposed Pretrial Order due by 9/26/2014. Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference are set for 10/3/2014 03:00 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Five (5) day Jury Trial set for 10/20/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/18/13. (rebsec, )
June 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER setting Scheduling/Planning Conference for 9/18/2013 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/27/2013. (klyon, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Electronic Packaging Solutions, Inc. et al v. Dickstein Shapiro, LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Stark
Represented By: Nathan Gerald Osborn
Represented By: Christopher Anthony Taravella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eversealed Windows, Inc.
Represented By: Nathan Gerald Osborn
Represented By: Christopher Anthony Taravella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Electronic Packaging Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Anthony Taravella
Represented By: Nathan Gerald Osborn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dickstein Shapiro, LLP
Represented By: Michael J. Roche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?