High Country Citizens' Alliance et al v. United States Forest Service et al
| High Country Citizens' Alliance, WildEarth Guardians and Sierra Club |
| United States Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Daniel Jiron, Scott Armentrout, Helen Hankins and United States Department of the Interior |
| Ark Land Company and Mountain Coal Company |
| 1:2013cv01723 |
| July 1, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| John L. Kane |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER re: 112 Stipulation, filed by Daniel Jiron, Bureau of Land Management, United States Forest Service, Scott Armentrout, United States Department of the Interior, Ruth Welch, United States Department of Agriculture, by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 3/6/2015. (tscha, )
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER: Final Order in Administrative Appeal. The federal defendants' June 27, 2013 approvals of the Sunset Trail Area Coal Exploration Plan are vacated, and any and all actions pursuant to those approvals are permanently enjoined. The federa l defendants' August 2, 2012 and December 27, 2012 approvals of Arch Coal's lease modifications are vacated. The North Fork Exception to the Colorado Roadless Rule, 36 C.F.R. § 294.43 (c)(1)(ix), is severed from the remainder of the CRR and is vacated. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 9/11/14. (jdyne, )
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER: Plaintiff's petition for review of agency action is granted and sustained. 71 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is moot. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 6/27/14.(jdyne, )
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting 60 Motion to Amend Case Caption, by Judge John L. Kane on 3/19/2014.(trlee, )
|
|
Filing
48
FIRST 37 AMENDED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN (ORDER). Adm Plaintiffs Brief due by 3/20/2014. Respondents' Response Brief due 4/17/14. Intervenors' Response Brief due by 4/21/2014. Adm Plaintiff Reply Brief due by 5/2/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 1/22/14. (mfiel, ) (mfiel, )
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 40 Federal Defendants' Unopposed Motion for a Stay of Briefing Schedule. The summary judgment briefing schedule set forth in the Parties' 37 Joint Case Management Plan and approved by the Court is stayed during the current lapse in federal appropriations. By Judge John L. Kane on 10/11/13.(mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
37
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN (ORDER). Adm Plaintiffs Brief due by 12/13/2013. Adm Defendants Brief due by 1/17/2014. Adm Plaintiff Reply Brief due by 2/12/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 8/6/13. (mnfsl, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS HIGH COUNTRY CITIZENS' ALLIANCE ET AL.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT granting 28 Unopposed Motion for Leave. By Judge John L. Kane on 7/25/13.(mjgsl, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER re: 8 Proposed Scheduling Order filed by WildEarth Guardians, High Country Citizens' Alliance. Joint Motion for Proposed Briefing Schedulefor Temporary Restraining Order GRANTED. Deadline for Plaintiffs filing a Motion for TRO: Friday July 5, 2013. Deadline for Federal Defendants, and any intervenor-defendant or proposed intervenor-defendant, filing opposition to Plaintiffs motion for TRO: Tuesday July 9, 2013. Motion Hearing re: Plaintiff's Temporary Restraining Order set for 7/11/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 802 before Judge John L. Kane. Signed by Judge John L. Kane on July 6, 2013. (ebutl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
