Mercury Companies, Inc. v. Comerica, Bank
Mercury Companies, Inc. |
Comerica Bank |
1:2013cv01921 |
July 18, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Richard P. Matsch |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER that the defendant, Comerica Bank, shall have and recover from the plaintiff, Mercury Companies, Inc., the amount of $168,511.83 as fees and expenses paid by the defendant in obtaining judgment of dismissal of this civil action, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/2/2014.(evana, ) |
Filing 37 ORDER On Defendant Comerica Bank's Application for Expedited Consideration of Motion for Reconsideration: Defendant Comerica Bank's Motion for Reconsideration of March 18, 2014 Order Deferring Ruling on Motion for Attorneys' Fees Pendi ng Appeal 32 and its Motion to Expedite Consideration of Motion for Reconsideration 34 are granted. Plaintiff Mercury Companies shall have up to and including May 13, 2014 to file its Response to Comerica's Motion for Attorney Fees and Expenses 22 . Comerica shall file its Reply no later than May 20, 2014, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/14/2014 ( 33 termed re 32 ). (jsmit) |
Filing 27 ORDER Deferring Ruling on Motion for Attorneys' Fees Pending Appeal, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/18/2014, re 22 and 26 . {rpmcd) |
Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Clerk re 20 : this civil action is dismissed and defendant is awarded costs upon the filing of a bill of costs within 14 days, by Clerk on 2/12/2014. (rpmcd) |
Filing 19 Courtroom Minutes Motions Hearing held on 2/11/2014 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint 7 , is granted. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 6 , is granted. A written order shall be prepared and entered. Defendant Comerica Bank's Objections to Evidence Presented by Plaintiff in Connection with its Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 16 , is overruled. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mercury Companies, Inc. v. Comerica, Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mercury Companies, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Bruce E. Rohde |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Comerica Bank | |
Represented By: | Duncan Eugene Barber |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.