Mercury Companies, Inc. v. Comerica, Bank
Plaintiff: Mercury Companies, Inc.
Defendant: Comerica Bank
Case Number: 1:2013cv01921
Filed: July 18, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER that the defendant, Comerica Bank, shall have and recover from the plaintiff, Mercury Companies, Inc., the amount of $168,511.83 as fees and expenses paid by the defendant in obtaining judgment of dismissal of this civil action, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/2/2014.(evana, )
April 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER On Defendant Comerica Bank's Application for Expedited Consideration of Motion for Reconsideration: Defendant Comerica Bank's Motion for Reconsideration of March 18, 2014 Order Deferring Ruling on Motion for Attorneys' Fees Pendi ng Appeal 32 and its Motion to Expedite Consideration of Motion for Reconsideration 34 are granted. Plaintiff Mercury Companies shall have up to and including May 13, 2014 to file its Response to Comerica's Motion for Attorney Fees and Expenses 22 . Comerica shall file its Reply no later than May 20, 2014, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/14/2014 ( 33 termed re 32 ). (jsmit)
March 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Deferring Ruling on Motion for Attorneys' Fees Pending Appeal, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/18/2014, re 22 and 26 . {rpmcd)
February 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Clerk re 20 : this civil action is dismissed and defendant is awarded costs upon the filing of a bill of costs within 14 days, by Clerk on 2/12/2014. (rpmcd)
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Courtroom Minutes Motions Hearing held on 2/11/2014 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint 7 , is granted. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 6 , is granted. A written order shall be prepared and entered. Defendant Comerica Bank's Objections to Evidence Presented by Plaintiff in Connection with its Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 16 , is overruled. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mercury Companies, Inc. v. Comerica, Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mercury Companies, Inc.
Represented By: Bruce E. Rohde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Comerica Bank
Represented By: Duncan Eugene Barber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?