Sanchez v. Hartley et al
Plaintiff: Tyler Sanchez
Defendant: Joe (I) Ryan Hartley, Ryan (I) Wolff, Mike (I) Duffy, Heather (I) Mykes, Michael (I) Dickson, Board of County Commissioners of Douglas County, Colorado and Douglas County Sheriff's Office
Case Number: 1:2013cv01945
Filed: July 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Douglas
Presiding Judge: William J. Martinez
Presiding Judge: Craig B. Shaffer
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 236 ORDER Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' various motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 175 , 180 , 184 ) are DENIED. A Final Pretrial Conference before the undersigned is hereby SET for Thursday, December 2 1, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Courtroom A801 of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, during which conference the Court will set this case for a Final Trial Preparation Conference and jury trial. ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/26/2017. (angar, )
November 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER DENYING 92 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION REQUESTING THAT THE COURT RETAIN JURISDICTION PENDING INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL. After entry of this Order, the Clerk of Court shall administratively CLOSE this action. Any party may seek leave to reopen this case for good cause shown. By Judge William J. Martinez on 11/13/2014. (alowe)
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER Defendants Motion to Reconsider or Alternatively for Certification of Issue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) ECF No. 84 is DENIED; and Defendants Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal and for Expedited Briefing ECF No. 85 is DENIED AS MOOT, by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/30/2014.(evana, )
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiffs claim against the Office of the District Attorney for the Eighteenth Judicial District is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on Eleventh Ame ndment Immunity; The Office of the District Attorney for the Eighteenth Judicial District is removed as a party in this action and the parties shall update the caption accordingly; The Motion is denied in all other respects; and This action shal l proceed on Plaintiffs claim for violation of the Fourth Amendment against Detective Joe Ryan Hartley, Detective Ryan Wolff, Detective Mike Duffy, Detective Heather Mykes, Investigator Michael Dickson, the Board of County Commissioners of Douglas County, and Douglas County Sheriffs Office, by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/20/2014.(evana, )
May 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 73 MINUTE ENTRY for Motion Hearing held on 5/13/2014 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. The Court denies without prejudice 67 Motion for Leave. FTR: Courtroom A-402. (nrich)
December 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Telephonic Status Conference held on 12/4/2013. 33 Joint Motion to Stay is DENIED. The court will allow discovery to go forward as to any individual or entity that has not and cannot assert qualified immunity. Discovery directed to the individual Defendants and their depositions shall be STAYED. FTR: Courtroom A402 - C. Covington. (ccovi)
October 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 42 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 10/21/2013. The court will TAKE UNDER ADVISEMENT 33 Joint Motion to Stay Discovery. All discovery shall be stayed pending complet ion of the briefing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Within 72 hours of completion of the briefing, counsel shall put together a telephone conference call and contact chambers to set the matter for a further hearing. 38 Motion for Protective Order is GRANTED. FTR: Courtroom A402 - C. Covington. (ccovi)
September 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting 27 Parties Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Fifth Amendment Claim filed September 18, 2013. Plaintiffs Fifth Amendment Claim is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay his/her or its own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/18/2013.(ervsl, )
August 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 8/7/13. (ccovi)
July 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER setting a Scheduling Conference on 10/7/2013 at 9:15 a.m. in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 7/30/13. (cbssec)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanchez v. Hartley et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyler Sanchez
Represented By: Sarah J. Parady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe (I) Ryan Hartley
Represented By: Ann Baumgartner Smith
Represented By: Gordon Lamar Vaughan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryan (I) Wolff
Represented By: Ann Baumgartner Smith
Represented By: Gordon Lamar Vaughan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike (I) Duffy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heather (I) Mykes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael (I) Dickson
Represented By: Keith M. Goman
Represented By: Andrew David Ringel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Board of County Commissioners of Douglas County, Colorado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas County Sheriff's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?