Kegel v. National Bank of Canada
Petitioner: Adam Kegel
Respondent: National Bank of Canada
Case Number: 1:2013cv02054
Filed: August 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Blackburn
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1782 Assistance to foreign & international tribunals & litigants
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting 1 Application to Take Discovery Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/20/13.(bnbcd, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kegel v. National Bank of Canada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: National Bank of Canada
Represented By: Jeffrey D. Felder
Represented By: Lauren Elizabeth Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Adam Kegel
Represented By: Michael J. Guyerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?