Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. v. First California Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Defendant: First California Mortgage Corporation
Case Number: 1:2013cv02113
Filed: August 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Christine M. Arguello
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER re: 63 Stipulation of Dismissal of Case filed by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay its own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 02/25/2015. (athom, )
February 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER on Joint Motion for Vacatur/Relief From Order and Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b) re 59 Motion to Vacate. It is ORDERED that the Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment entered on April 30, 2014 (Doc. # 33 ); the Final Judgment entered on May 2, 2014 (Doc. # 34 ); and the Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify Judgment Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 59 (Doc. # 52 ) are VACATED. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 02/09/2015. (athom, )
January 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER on 56 Stipulated Motion for Indicative Ruling. The Court hereby INDICATES that, in the interest of bringing finality to this case through settlement, it has no objection to vacating the Order and Judgment should the case be remanded to this Court by the Tenth Circuit for such purpose. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 01/21/2015. (athom, )
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 35 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify Judgment Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 59. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 08/05/2014. (athom, )
May 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 FINAL JUDGMENT re: 33 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 5/2/2014. (shart)
April 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting 21 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 30 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. This case is dismissed with prejudice. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 04/30/2014.(athom, )
November 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/6/13. (sgrim)
August 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 11/5/2013 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/12/13. (sgrim)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. v. First California Mortgage Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First California Mortgage Corporation
Represented By: William Frederick Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Kennedy Calisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?