Dixon v. Hartley et al
Robert H. Dixon |
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Steve Hartley |
1:2013cv02174 |
August 14, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Crowley |
Boyd N. Boland |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 ORDER dismissing this action with prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 8/28/14. No certificate of appealability shall issue. (dkals, ) |
Filing 37 Amended ORDER to Dismiss in Part by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/14/14. (dkals, ) |
Filing 30 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and for Answer. By Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/4/2014. (klyon, ) |
Filing 28 ORDER Drawing Case to a district judge, or, if appropriate, to amagistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a), by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/3/2014. (agarc, ) |
Filing 22 ORDER to File Amended Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/27/2014. (skl) |
Filing 18 ORDER Directing Applicant to File Amended Application, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/04/2013. (skl) |
Filing 9 ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/23/2013. (skl) |
Filing 7 ORDER denying 3 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 and vacating 4 Order by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/9/13. (dkals, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.