Hagos v. Raemisch et al
Petitioner: Abraham Hagos
Respondent: Rick Raemisch, James Falk and John Suthers
Case Number: 1:2013cv02375
Filed: September 3, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Logan
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER TO FILE ANSWER AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE Within thirty days after the filing of the state court record, Respondents shall file an Answer that complies with this Order. Within thirty days of the filing of the Answer, the Applicant may file a reply if he desires, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/8/16. (ktera)
November 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Applicant Abraham Hagos's Motion for Reconsideration [Doc. 18] is denied and this case is dismissed; Hagos's Motion for a Certificate of Appealability [Doc. 18] is granted. The clerk shall provide a copy of this Order t o the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in conjunction with transmission of Hagos's Notice of Appeal; Hagos's Motion to Appoint CJA Counsel [Doc. 10] is granted. Jonathan Reppucci shall be appointed Hagos's CJA counsel; and Hagos's Motion for Leave to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 [Doc. 2] is granted, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/10/2014. (jsmit)
November 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER that Hagos v. Raemisch, No. 13-cv-2375-RPM, be stayed pending the resolution of Hagos v. Werholtz, No. 13-1124 (10th Cir.), by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/14/2013. (ervsl, )
November 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER AMENDING 13 ORDER DEFERRING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OFCOUNSEL : the order directing the response by November 22, 2013, is vacated, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/8/2013. (rpmcd)
November 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER DEFERRING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL re 10 / 12 : ruling on the motion for appointment of counsel is deferred and the petitioner shall respond to the Order to Show Cause on or before November 22, 2013, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/7/2013. (rpmcd )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hagos v. Raemisch et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Abraham Hagos
Represented By: Jonathan Dickon Reppucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rick Raemisch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James Falk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Suthers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?