Stearn et al v. Catalus Capital ,LLC
Plaintiff: Leathem Stearn, Ute Mesa Lot 1, LLC and Ute Mesa Lot 2, LLC
Defendant: Catalus Capital ,LLC
Case Number: 1:2013cv02514
Filed: September 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Pitkin
Presiding Judge: William J. Martinez
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 48 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court holds as a matter of law that Stearn is entitled to at least $9,274.66 in breach-of-contract damages, and that Cataluss third and fourth counterclaim s (negligent misrepresentation and fraud) fail for lack of damages evidence. Stearns Motion is otherwise denied. This matter REMAINS SET for a four-day jury trial beginning on February 16, 2016, with a Final Trial Preparation Conference at 2:00 p.m. on January 29, 2016, in Courtroom A801, by Judge William J. Martinez on 07/23/2015.(cthom, )
April 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference set for 5/12/2015 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/30/2015. (alowe)
June 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER denying 18 Defendants Motion to Dismiss in it's entirety by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/27/2014.(evana, )
March 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/19/2014. (evana, )
October 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 12/18/2013 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/2/13. (sgrim)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stearn et al v. Catalus Capital ,LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leathem Stearn
Represented By: Robert Alan Kitsmiller
Represented By: Richard B. Podoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ute Mesa Lot 1, LLC
Represented By: Robert Alan Kitsmiller
Represented By: Richard B. Podoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ute Mesa Lot 2, LLC
Represented By: Robert Alan Kitsmiller
Represented By: Richard B. Podoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Catalus Capital ,LLC
Represented By: Michael Jacob Laszlo
Represented By: Theodore E. Laszlo, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?