Page v. Pueblo Colorado Mental/Health Institute et al
| Sharrieckia Page |
| Human and Social Services, Adams County Detention/Facility, Pueblo Colorado Mental/Health Institute and Jennifer Jones |
| 1:2013cv02553 |
| September 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER that the claims for monetary damages against improper parties are dismissed with prejudice because these claims either are legally frivolous or are seeking relief from Defendants entitled to immunity pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) . It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs first and second claims are dismissed as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (B). It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims challenging her conviction and sentence are dismissed withou t prejudice as barred by the rule in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that any other pending motions are denied as moot, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/6/2014. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Directing Plaintiff To File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/1/13. (nmmsl, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/07/2013. (skl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
