Johnson v. Western State Colorado University et al
Keifer Johnson |
Western State Colorado University, Brad Baca, Gary Pierson, Sara Phillips and Sara (I) Phillips |
1:2013cv02747 |
October 8, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Boyd N. Boland |
William J. Martinez |
Civil Rights: Education |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 194 ORDER denying 182 Motion to Lift Stay of Discovery. Plaintiff shall file his response to Defendants' 178 Motion to Dismiss in accordance with the Court's 12/2/2014 Order. By Judge William J. Martinez on 1/20/2015.(alowe) |
Filing 188 ORDER denying 93 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions. By Judge William J. Martinez on 12/5/2014.(alowe) |
Filing 180 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/13/14. Discovery is STAYED pending further order of the court. Within ten days of any ruling on Defendants 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss 178 the parties shall file status reports addressing the ruling and whether any pretrial mattersremain to be scheduled. (bsimm, ) |
Filing 173 ORDER Defendants Western, Baca, Pierson, Phillips, and Luekengas Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint ECF No. 150 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; Defendant Susan Coykendalls Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Third Amended Com plaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 12 (b)(1) ECF No. 163 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; Plaintiffs claims arising under Title IX (Claims 1-4) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Plaintiffs § 1983 claims alleging procedural du e process violations (Claims 6-9) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Plaintiffs § 1983 First Amendment claim (Claim 5) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in so far as it seeks monetary damages or declaratory relief; Plaintiffs state law claims (Cla ims 10-12) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as barred by the CGIA; This case shall proceed only as to Plaintiffs § 1983 First Amendment claim (Claim 5) in so far as it seeks prospective injunctive relief in the form of expungement of the First Disciplinary Proceeding from Plaintiffs official academic record; and Per Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Bolands May 15, 2014 Order, Plaintiff shall file a status report within ten days of this Order, by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/24/2014.(evana, ) |
Filing 145 AMENDED ORDER re: 137 Order on Motion to Dismiss, is amended to add one additional document to those subject to RESTRICTION LEVEL 1: Doc. # 122-1 Bates No. OG-069., by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/27/2014. (evana, ) |
Filing 137 ORDER The Motion to Stay Doc. # 94 is GRANTED. All discovery is stayed pending a ruling on the defendants defenses of qualified and Eleventh Amendment immunity. The deadlines contained in the Scheduling Order are VACATED. The First Motion to Quas h Doc. # 100 is GRANTED; The Motion to Amend Doc. # 113 is GRANTED; Defendants Motion to Dismiss Doc. # 85 is DENIED as moot; The Motion to Hold In Abeyance Doc. # 114 is DENIED as moot; Goulds Motion to Restrict Doc. # 99 and Goulds Mot ion to File Under Restriction Doc. # 121 are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; Goulds Motion to Quash Doc. # 131 is DENIED as moot; Goulds Motion to Restrict Doc. ## 111 and 112 Doc. # 124 is DENIED, and Plaintiffs Motion to Exceed Page Limit Doc. # 127 is GRANTED, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/15/2014.(evana, ) |
Filing 109 ORDER denying without prejudice 103 Motion to Amend; Denying as moot 104 Motion for Extension, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/23/2014.(evana, ) |
Filing 88 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/25/14. The Joint Motion... to Stay Discovery Pending Alternative Dispute Resolution 83 is GRANTED. The Motion to Vacate Schedule 84 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Discovery cut-off is extende d to and including June 16, 2014. A settlement conference is set for 4/7/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement statement to my chambers on or before March 31, 2014. (bsimm) |
Filing 74 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/27/14. (Simmons, B.) |
Filing 47 ORDER denying 2 Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction; The Courts Temporary Restraining Order ECF Nos. 37 & 44 shall EXPIRE on its own terms, by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/18/2013.(ervsl, ) |
Filing 38 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 1/16/2014 03:00 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, proposed scheduling order due by 1/9/2014. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/23/13. (bnbcd, ) |
Filing 37 ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 23 . Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is effective until November 4, 2013. Defendants have up to and including Wednesday, October 23, 2013 to supplement their response to the Motion. The briefing schedule in (ECF No. 10) is MODIFIED to reflect that Plaintiff has up to and including October 30, 2013 to file his Reply in support of his Motion. This Order shall expire no later than 14 days from today, October 21, 2013, except for good cause shown by Plaintiff. Persons bound by this Order include any parties who receive actual notice of it by personal service or otherwise, pursuant to Rule 65(d)(2). SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/21/2013. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER of Disqualification. ORDERED that the undersigned district judge is disqualified from presiding or acting further in this case by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/09/13. (jjhsl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.