Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
Roderick Ray Brown |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA Noticing |
1:2013cv02890 |
October 23, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Arapahoe |
John L. Kane |
Disability Insurance |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 35 ORDER AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER. By Clerk on 3/20/15. (kfinn) |
Filing 35 ORDER AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER: The conclusion of the Commissioner through the Administrative Law Judge that plaintiff was not disabled is AFFIRMED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/11/2015. (alowe) |
Filing 34 MINUTE ORDER granting 31 Motion for status. Plaintiff is advised that his social security appeal will be handled in due course. Motion for Status & Acknowledgment of Non-Consent of Magistrate Judge & Request for Scheduling Conference 33 , is denied as moot in part and denied in part. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/7/2015. (tscha, ) Modified on 1/8/2015 to correct judge(tscha, ). |
Filing 21 Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 3/17/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 4/16/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 5/1/2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 02/05/14. (jhawk, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER Directing Plaintiff To Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/24/13. (nmmsl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.