Dalton v. Social Security Administration
| Josie Dalton |
| Social Security Administration |
| SSA Noticing |
| 1:2013cv02999 |
| November 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Adams |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER granting 29 Motion for Attorney Fees. ORDERED that the Defendant pay to Plaintiff, through counsel, reasonable attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $5, 150.00 by Judge John L. Kane on 08/19/14.(jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
28
FINAL JUDGMENT. Ordered that Accordingly, final judgment is hereby entered in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, consistent with the United States Supreme Court's decision in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993). Ordered that Plaintiff may have her costs upon the filing of a Bill of Costs within fourteen days of entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1 by Clerk on 07/18/14. (jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
18
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 4/21/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 5/21/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 6/5/2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 02/24/14. (jhawk, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Directing Plaintiff To File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/4/13. (nmmsl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
