Sladek et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Diana Sladek and Dennis Sladek |
Bank of America, N.A., Aronowitz & Mecklenburg, Thomas Mowle and MERS |
1:2013cv03094 |
November 14, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
El Paso |
Boyd N. Boland |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 166 ORDER. ORDERED that plaintiffs Diana Sladek and Dennis Sladek are prohibited from filing any notice of removal of any state court action to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado unless such notice is filed by an attorney, other than Mr. Sladek, who represents them or unless they first seek leave from the Court and the Court grants such leave. Failure to comply with this Order may result in further sanctions. Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 09/08/15. (jhawk, ) |
Filing 162 ORDER. ORDERED that plaintiffs Diana Sladek and Dennis Sladek's Motion forReconsideration of Order Remanding Action to State Court 149 isDENIED. ORDERED that plaintiffs Diana Sladek and Dennis Sladek's Motion forReconsideration of Order Dismissing Case 151 is DENIED. ORDERED that plaintiffs Diana Sladek and Dennis Sladek's Renewed Motion forReconsideration of Order Dismissing Case 157 is DENIED. Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 08/25/15.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 163 ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/25/15. ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 135 is ACCEPTED. It is furtherORDERED that plaintiffs Diana Sladek and Dennis Sladek's Motion to AmendComplaint 130 is DENIED. ORDERED: Within 14 days of the entry of judgment, defendants may have their costs by filing a bill of costs with the Clerk of the Court. ORDERED: This case is dismissed in its entirety.(kpreu) |
Filing 147 ORDER. ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 94] is ACCEPTED. ORDERED that defendant Thomas Mowle's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 54] is GRANTED. ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 109] is ACCEPTED. ORDERED that defendants Bank of America, N.A., MERS, Aronowitz & Mecklenburg, and Robert J. Aronowitz' Joint Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6) [Docke t No. 70] is GRANTED. ORDERED that plaintiffs' first, second, third, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, and eleventh claims for relief are dismissed with prejudice. ORDERED that plaintiffs' fourth claim for relief is stricken by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 03/10/15.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 143 ORDER granting 133 defendant Bank of America, N.A.s Motion for Order Remanding Action to State Court. It is further ORDERED that the actions plaintiff sought to remove are remanded to the District Court for the County of El Paso, where they were filed as Case Nos. 11-cv-34134 and 11-cv-00375, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/28/2015.(evana, ) |
Filing 129 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 126 Motion to Amend Complaint by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/01/14.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 125 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint [filed August 6, 2014; docket #111] is denied without prejudice. Motion to Stay Defendants' Response Deadline to Plaintiffs' Motion to Allow Third Amended Complaint [filed August 29, 2014; docket #120] is denied as moot by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 09/23/14.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 124 ORDER granting 117 Motion to Strike. The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to strike the Notice (docket #116) from the record by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 09/16/14.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 105 Minute ORDER granting 103 Motion for Court to Order Defendants to Serve Pleadings on Plaintiffs. Defendants are ordered to re-send any filings since June 27, 2014, and send any future filings, to the Plaintiffs at their new address by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/22/2014.(agarc, ) |
Filing 90 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 88 Motion to Recuse Aronowitz & Mecklenburg from Representation of Bank of America by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 06/30/14.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 86 ORDER granting 79 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Stay Discovery Deadlines. A temporary stay of discovery is entered pending resolution of the Defendants' motions to dismiss. The parties shall file a status report within five days of any order resolving their motions to dismiss. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/24/2014. (cpear) |
Filing 69 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 67 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6). These Defendants may re-file the motion in accordance with the applicable standards and rules on or before June 2, 2014 by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 05/28/14.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 42 MINUTE ORDER granting 39 Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/16/2014, and denying as moot 31 Defendant El Paso County's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. (cpear) Modified on 4/17/2014 to correct text (cpear). |
Filing 29 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 27 Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/8/2014. (cpear) |
Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER granting 20 Motion to Clarify. The Scheduling Conference currently set for April 1, 2014 is vacated and rescheduled to May 15, 2014 at 9:45 a.m before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 03/19/14.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER Directing Plaintiffs to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/19/2013. (skl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.