Mapes v. City of Thornton, Colorado, The et al
| James G. Mapes |
| Richard E. Romito, Evan W. Potter, John D. Patterson, Randy Nelson, Canuto John Martinez, Keith Kramer, Greg Kiernan, Jessica Godres, Kevin L. Gifford, Kas R. Gettman, Joseph Cahill, Matthew L. Brooks, Bryan Adair, City of Thornton, Colorado, The, Bethany H. Slaughter De Sanchez, Bruce A. Stewart, Shawn M. Walsh, Abraham White, Eric D. Villanyi and Randy (I) Nelson |
| 1:2013cv03133 |
| November 18, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Adams |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Raymond P. Moore |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER confirming stipulated dismissal 41 , by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 6/4/2014. (trlee, )
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting 39 Motion to Dismiss of all claims against individual defendants, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 5/22/2014.(trlee, )
|
Filing
38
MINUTE ORDER granting 36 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify. Discovery due by 9/1/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 10/6/2014. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 12/10/2014. Pretrial Conference set for 12/17/2014 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/23/2014.(trlee, )
|
Filing
29
ORDER Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference for 1/24/2014 at 2:30 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/11/2013. (trlee, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.