Crew Tile Distribution, Inc. v. Porcelanosa Los Angeles, Inc. et al
| Crew Tile Distribution, Inc. |
| Porcelanosa Los Angeles, Inc, Porcelanosa New York, Inc and Porcelanosa Texas, Inc |
| 1:2013cv03206 |
| November 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| William J. Martinez |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
401
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's and Counterclaim Defendants' 394 Motion for New Trial, by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/29/2017. (angar, )
|
|
Filing
279
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 242 Porcelanosa's Motion Raising Objections to the Sur-Rebuttal Report of Plaintiff's Expert, Steve[n] Hazel; Granting 252 Crew Tile's Motion to Strike the Reports of Defendants' Undi sclosed Experts; Granting in Part and Denying in Part 253 Porcelanosa's Combined Motion In Limine; and, Granting in Part and Denying in Part 251 The Crew Tile Parties' Joint Motion In Limine to Exclude Certain Evidence. ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 02/16/2017. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing
210
ORDER; After review of the proposed Final Pretrial Order 208 , this court is satisfied that the parties have met their obligations pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(e) and a further telephonic conference at this stage would not be productive. The proposed Final Pretrial Order shall be entered as an Order of Court. The telephonic conference scheduled on April 7, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. is VACATED, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/6/16. (morti, )
|
|
Filing
195
ORDER. Defendants' Resubmitted Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery from Plaintiff and Third Party Defendants 161 is granted in part and denied in part consistent with the record made during the hearing. Plaintiff will submit a revised version of Exhibit 1, notebook of Darlyne Davis, to the Defendants on or before February 8, 2016, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/4/16. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
194
COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 2/3/2016 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Written Discovery 148 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendants' Exhibit A s hall be held under Restriction Level 3. Defendants are permitted to conduct a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, limited in scope to the financial documents produced by Crew Tile in November, 2015, as discussed. The deposition shall be completed within 60 days. The parties shall meet and confer regarding whether the deposition may extend to documents which may be produced after further consultation between the parties as discussed during the hearing. Plaintiff's Exhibit 1 shall be held under R estriction Level 3. Defendants Resubmitted Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery From Plaintiff and Third Party Defendants 161 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as discussed. The issue of whether the notebook used during the Davis deposition was properly redacted is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. The Court will issue a written order regarding the notebook after in camera review.FTR: KMT C201. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER granting in Part 58 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is AWARDED attorneys' fees of $1,960.25, by Judge William J. Martinez on 09/24/2015.(cthom, )
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER; Defendants, Counterclaimants and Third-Party Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims, Third Party Claims and Jury Demand 127 is GRANTED. The Scheduling Order 28 is amended as follows: Discovery due by 11/30/2015. Dispositive Motions due by 12/30/2015. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/15/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/24/15.(morti, )
|
|
Filing
111
MINUTE ORDER granting 108 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Amend Protective Order. The Stipulated Protective Order (Doc. No. 42 ) is amended to add the following Attorneys' Eyes Only Provision. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/19/2015. (alowe)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER denying 26 Defendants' Amended Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). By Judge William J. Martinez on 2/5/2015.(alowe)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER granting 83 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 85 ) is ACCEPTED AS FILED. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/3/2015. (alowe)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER denying 49 Defendants Motion for Protective Order under F.R.C.P. 26 (c) Pending the Courts Ruling on Defendants Amended Motion to Dismiss, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/24/2014.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
42
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/16/14. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
35
MINUTE ORDER. The Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Motion for Protective Order 32 is DENIED without prejudice, and the proposed Protective Order is REFUSED, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/8/14.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
16
AMENDED ORDER Resetting Scheduling Conference for 4/21/2014 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/30/14. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 2/20/2014 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/3/13. (sgrim)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
