Hill v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
| Scott Hill |
| United States Bureau of Prisons, Paul A. Laird, Charles A. Daniels, Mark Carter, Daniel Severn, William Hutchings, Anthony, Diane Borges, Richard Derr, B. Janusz, G. Lyde, T. Javernick, S. Brown and K. Johnson |
| 1:2013cv03404 |
| December 17, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 06/01/15 granting 86 Motion to File Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court is instructed to accept [#86-1] for filing as Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. The Status Conference set for June 12, 2015 at 10:30 a.m. shall remain on the courts calendar, to be vacated upon the Parties filing of a Stipulation to Dismiss this action. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 82 Motion for Order. Parties shall submit dismissal papers on or before 6/1/2015; a Status Conference is set for 6/12/2015 10:30 AM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/2/15.(nywlc1)
|
|
Filing
81
MINUTE ORDER granting 79 Unopposed Motion for An Additional Stay and Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/9/15. Defendants shall respond to the First Amended Complaint by 4/30/15. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
78
MINUTE ORDER granting 76 Unopposed Motion for An Additional 10-Day Stay and Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/26/15. Defendants shall respond to the First Amended Complaint by 4/13/15. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
75
MINUTE ORDER granting 73 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative to Amend Docket Number 69 by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 2/26/15. This matter is stayed to and including 4/2/15, and Defendants shall answer by 4/2/15. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
69
MINUTE ORDER granting 67 Unopposed Motion for Stay and for Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/29/15. All proceedings are stayed, and the defendants shall respond to the First Amended Complaint by 3/2/15. (dkals, )
|
|
Filing
64
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/28/14. The Unopposed Motion for Stay and for Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint 62 is GRANTED. All proceedings are STAYED to and including January 28, 2015; the defendants shall respond to the Complaint on or before February 11, 2015; and parties shall file a status report at the earlier of reaching an agreement to resolve the case or expiration of the stay addressing the status of the case. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER denying without prejudice as moot 44 Individual Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and 45 The Bureau of Prisons' Partial Motion to Dismiss by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/15/14.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
56
PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION DISCLOSED IN DISCOVERY entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/17/14. (bsimm, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/20/2013. (skl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
