Acosta v. Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
| Marie Acosta |
| Healthcare Services Group, Inc. |
| 1:2013cv03429 |
| December 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Weld |
| Robert E. Blackburn |
| Craig B. Shaffer |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER OF ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/16/2014. (alowe)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER APPROVING SECTION 216(b) SETTLEMENT: The parties 81 Amended Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and Dismissal of Prejudice is GRANTED. All claims of the named plaintiff and the 21 opt-in plaintiffs under the Fair Labor Standa rds Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. No costs are ASSESED against defendant. This Order IS STAYED pending approval of similar motions to approve the settlements reached in Cox v. Healthcare Services Group In c (N.D. Ohio Case No. 3:13-cv-00293-JZ) and Bowman v. Healthcare Services Group Inc, (N.D. Ohio Case No. 3:13-cv-1924-JZ). Within eleven (11) days of the approval of the last such motion in the parallel cases, the parties SHALL FILE a joint status report apprising the court of the resolution of this matter so that the case may be closed and judgment may be entered. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/12/2014. (alowe)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER granting 79 Unopposed Motion to Decertify the Collective Action. The collective action conditionally certified by this court's Order Granting Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Conditional Certification 2 at 1-2 [# 37 ], filed 3/21/2014, is DECERTIFIED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/20/2014.(alowe)
|
|
Filing
77
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 8/7/2014. Granting in part and denying in part 74 Joint Motion for Stay of Case Pending Mediation and Amendment of the Scheduling Ord er to Extend Certain Deadlines. Motion denied in that stay is not entered and dispositive motions deadline is not extended. Granted in that certain deadlines are extended. Discovery due by 12/30/2014. Scheduling Order 39 is amended accordingly. Court Reporter: FTR - E. E. Miller. FTR: Courtroom A402. (emill)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER Approving 71 Stipulation for Dismissal. The claims of opt-in plaintiff, William R. Anderson, against defendant, Healthcare Services Group, Inc., are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each of the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 7/7/2014. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
68
AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER approved by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (cbslc1)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER re: 63 Stipulation of Dismissal of Party filed by Healthcare Services Group, Inc., by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/22/2014. (trlee, )
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting 36 Unopposed Motion for Conditional Certification. A collective action is CONDITIONALLY CERTIFIED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/21/2014.(klyon, )
|
|
Filing
35
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 03/17/2014. (cbslc1)
|
|
Filing
30
TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4/17/2015. Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference set 4/24/2015 03:00 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Five (5) day Jury Trial set for 5/11/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/6/14. (rebsec,)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
