Ippolito v. Justice Service Division et al
| Joseph C. Ippolito |
| Ashlea Neal, Christopher (I) Nandrea, Christopher Nandrea, Intervention Community Correction Services, Melinda (I) Rose, Melinda Rose, Leslie (I) Holmes, Leslie Holmes, Kurt (I) Pierpont, Kurt Pierpont, Justice Service Division, Ashlea (I) Neal, Shawana M. Green, Shawana (I) M. Green, Norchem Drug Testing Laboratories, A. Fischinger and A. (I) Fischinger |
| 1:2013cv03480 |
| December 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Jefferson |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
MINUTE ORDER denying 42 Motion for Clarification by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/31/14.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying 24 Motion Requesting Permission for Leave to Directly or Collaterally Attack Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice Entered on Appeal, filed pro se by Plaintiff Joseph C. Ippolito on March 3, 2014, which the Court has treated as a motion seeking relief from the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/6/2014.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
21
MINUTE ORDER granting request for forms 20 by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/18/14.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/4/14. (dkals, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
