Smith v. Bonner et al
Willard C. Smith |
Bobby Bonner and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, John Suthers |
1:2013cv03499 |
December 27, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Kit Carson |
Boyd N. Boland |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of BOBBY BONNER, WARDEN, and CYNTHIA COFFMAN, Attorney General, State of Colorado against WILLARD C. SMITH re: 30 Order on Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. By Clerk on 5/15/15. (kfinn) |
Filing 30 ORDER: The 10 Amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied. This case is dismissed with prejudice. A Certificate of appealability shall not issued under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 5/12/2015. (alowe) |
Filing 23 Second ORDER for State Court Records. By July 1, 2014, Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court the state court record for People v. Smith, Otero County District Court Case No. 04CR247. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 6/18/2014. (klyon, ) |
Filing 21 ORDER to Draw Case. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/1/2014. (klyon, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER To File Pre-Answer Response by Respondents, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 02/13/14. (nmarb, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER Directing Applicant To File Amended Pleading and DENYING 5 Motion to Stay, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/15/14.(nmmsl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.