Bradley v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| Matthew Bradley |
| U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, David Berkebile, Nixon and Pelton |
| 1:2014cv00013 |
| January 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Marcia S. Krieger |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
JUDGMENT in favor of Pelton, U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, David Berkebile, Nixon Roberts against Matthew Bradley re: 65 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Report and Recommendations. by Clerk on 3/13/15. (pglov)
|
|
Filing
56
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: Summary judgment on the Defendants' affirmative defense as requested in their Motion for Summary Judgment 28 is DENIED. The parties shall contact the Magistrate Judge to schedule a scheduling conference or to receive further instructions regarding this case. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 11/3/14.(msksec, )
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 52 Partial Motion to Reconsider 50 Recommendation on Defendant Roberts' Motion to Dismiss by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 7/9/14.(dkals, )
|
|
Filing
51
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION: Mr. Bradley's Objections (#41) to the Recommendations are overruled. The Court therefore ADOPTS the Recommendation and DENIES Mr. Bradley's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction 15 . by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 6/5/14.(msksec, )
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 36 Defendants' Motion to Stay. This matter is STAYED pending resolution of the pending motion for summary judgment 28 and motion to dismiss 35 . Scheduling Conference set for 4/25/2014 09:00 AM is vacated. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/21/2014.(emill)
|
|
Filing
27
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe: Status Conference held on 3/10/2014. Defendant John Doe, Unknown Persons is dismissed; Defendant name Nixon is corrected to Dr. Nixon Roberts. Granti ng in part and denying in part 26 Defendant Motion for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment Concerning Lack of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Motion to Stay. Motion to Stay is denied; Motion for Summary Judgment is accepted for fil ing as of this date. Deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Motion for Summary Judgment is 4/1/2014. Deadline for Defendant(s) to respond to Plaintiff's Verified Emergency Motion forTemporary Restraining Order/and or Preliminary Injunction Pursuant toFed. R. Civ. P. 65 15 is 3/21/2014. Scheduling Conference set for 4/25/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Court Reporter: FTR - Ellen E. Miller. FTR: Courtroom A502. (mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER setting Status Conference for Pro Se Plaintiff. Status Conference set for 3/10/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/6/2014. (klyon, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be assigned to a district judge and to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/17/2014. (skl)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/6/14. (rbjcd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
