Buhl v. Sproul et al
Plaintiff: Leroy Buhl
Defendant: R. Sproul, D. Stamper, K. Lincoln, Blake Davis, C. Daniels, Paul Laird, Gordon Harpe, Fred Frandle, Charles Samuels Jr., R. Mack and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Case Number: 1:2014cv00302
Filed: January 31, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Fremont
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 139 ORDER That the Recommendation Regarding Defendant Federal Bureau of Prisons' Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 134 filed January 26, 2016, is approved and adopted as an order of this court; That the Federal Bureau of Prisons Mot ion To Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 64 Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) 70 filed May 8, 2015, is granted; That all claims asserted in the amended complaint 64 against the Federal Bureau of Prisons are dismissed with prejudice; and That the Federal Bureau of Prisons is dropped as a defendant in this action. Signed by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/8/2016.(cmira)
January 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER 1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 115 filed December 03, 2015, is approved and adopted as an order of this court; 2. That the objections 121 of the plaintiff are overruled; 3. That the 85 Motion to Amend Complaint to Include an Additional Defendant: Steven Clough is Denied as futile; 4. That the 96 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction is Denied as moot, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/25/2016.(evana, )
December 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ORDER re: 122 USCA Letter (with Writ of Mandamus filed with Court of Appeals). USCA Case Number 15-1437. That argument is unavailing, as mandamus may not be used as a substitute for an appeal. Weston v. Mann (In re Weston), 18 F.3d 860, 864 (10th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the petition is dismissed, on 12/29/2015. (evana, )
December 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER re: 64 Amended Complaint filed by Leroy Buhl, granting Service by United States Marshal, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 12/1/15. (nmarb, )
March 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER ADOPTING 54 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The 29 Federal Bureau of Prisons' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. p. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) is granted. The 30 Federal Bureau of Prisons' Partial Motion f or Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies is granted. Plaintiff's 41 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. Plaintiff's 48 Motion in Traverse and Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. Plaintiff 's 61 Motion for Declaratory Judgment Addendum is denied. By 4/27/2015 the plaintiff, Leroy Buhl may file an amended complaint amending and restating his claim under the Eighth Amendment which claim is now alleged in the complaint [# 1 ] as the sixth claims for relief. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/16/2015. (alowe)
May 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case. Claims one through four in the Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. 1 ) are dismissed without prejudice. The motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 15 ), which the Court construes as an objection to a Minute Order (ECF No. 13 ), is overruled. This case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/14/2014.(klyon, )
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER denying 11 Motion to Reconsider. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/25/2014.(klyon, )
April 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 12 Motion to Amend Complaint to Include Additional Defendants, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/24/2014.(slibi, )
February 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying 5 Motion to Seal and Order Re: Caption, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/10/2014. ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall remove the filing restrictions currently in place with respect to the Prisoner Complaint 1 . (slibi, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buhl v. Sproul et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leroy Buhl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Sproul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Stamper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. Lincoln
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blake Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Daniels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Laird
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gordon Harpe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fred Frandle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Samuels Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Mack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?