Johnson Jr. v. Falk et al
| Roger David Johnson Jr. |
| Falk and John Suthers |
| 1:2014cv00303 |
| January 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/23/2014. (trlee, )
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER re: 22 Response filed by Falk, John Suthers. The Court finds that Applicant did not receive the Pre-Answer Response from Respondents. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Respondents shall resend the Pre-Answer Response to Applicant and Wa rden Falk will notice the Court when the Response is delivered to Applicant. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will refrain from entering a decision on Applicants Motion to Rescind Order of Dismissal until twenty-one days from the date Warden F alk notices the Court that Applicant has received the Pre-Answer Response and has the opportunity to file a Reply. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will refrain from addressing the Motion to Rescind, filed on May 15, 2014, and the merits of Respondents Answer filed on May 28, 2014, at this time, by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/10/2014. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER This matter is before the Court on Respondents Response to Applicants Motion to Rescind the Courts May 9, 2014 Order and Applicants Supplement and Motion to Rescind, ECF Nos. 19 . Respondent Falk further is directed to provide documenta tion as to whether mail from the Attorney Generals Office was received by the Sterling Correctional Facility and provided to Applicant during the period from March 6, 2014, through May 9, 2014. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Respondent is directed to respond, on or before June 11, 2014, as instructed above, by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/3/2014. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER re: 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Roger David Johnson Jr.. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Claims One and Two (part b) are dismissed as procedurally barred from federal habeas review. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty days from today Respondents are directed to file an answer in compliance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases that fully addresses the merits of Claims Two (part a) and Three. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty days of the filing of an answer Applicant may file a reply if he desires. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of this Order the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court, in electronic format if available, a copy of th e complete record of Applicants state court proceedings in Case No. 07CR1984, including all documents in the state court file and transcripts of all proceedings conducted in the state court, but excluding any physical evidence (as opposed to documentary evidence) not relevant to the asserted claims. by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/9/2013. (evana, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DRAWING CASE Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/6/2014. (kweck)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/20/2014. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/07/2014. (slibi, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
