Hilts v. Mental Health Partners et al
Jaheem R. Hilts |
Sharon Pauley and Mental Health Partners |
1:2014cv00397 |
February 12, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Boulder |
Boyd N. Boland |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying without prejudice leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/22/14. (dkals, ) |
Filing 12 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/10/14. It is ORDERED that Mr. Hilts file, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, a second amended complaint that complies with this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Mr. Hilts fails within the time allowed to file a second amended complaint that complies with this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. (bsimm) |
Filing 11 ORDER denying as moot 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; denying as moot 5 Motion for Order; denying as moot 8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; and granting 10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/9/14.(nmarb, ) |
Filing 9 Second ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/18/2014. (slibi, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER Directing Plaintiff To Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 02/13/14. (nmarb, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.