Orica Australia Pty Ltd v. Aston Evaporative Services, LLC
| Orica Australia Pty Ltd |
| Aston Evaporative Services, LLC |
| 1:2014cv00412 |
| February 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX Outside US |
| William J. Martinez |
| Craig B. Shaffer |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 72 Third Party Defendant UE Manufacturing, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTED with respect to any consequential damages awarded to Orica on account of "the choice of fittings...used in t he primary intake to the hydraulic pumps, and the choice ofhose in the case drain lines" in Units 24, and otherwise DENIED. This matter REMAINS SET for a seven-day jury trial beginning on March 28, 2016, with a Final Trial Preparation Conference on March 4, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom A801, by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/21/2015.(cthom, )
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER DENYING 66 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge William J. Martinez on 07/28/2015.(cthom, )
|
|
Filing
85
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 6/4/2015. Granting 80 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify. Mr. Hendry's telephone deposition must take place within the next t hree weeks. Defense counsel may defer cross examination if needed. Defense counsel is allowed the same amount of time for cross examination as was used for direct examination. Within one week of today, Plaintiff's counsel is required to provide defense counsel with advanced copies of their proposed deposition exhibits. FTR: Courtroom A-402. (amont, )
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER granting 75 Motion for Discovery and Approving Stipulations for Additional Depositions to be Taken in Australia and Appointing Officers for Same by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 4/9/15.(cbssec)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 55 Motion for Discovery by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 12/2/14.(cbssec)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 52 Motion for Discovery Depositions by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 11/17/14.(cbssec)
|
|
Filing
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 7/7/14. (cbssec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Orica Australia Pty Ltd v. Aston Evaporative Services, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Orica Australia Pty Ltd | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Larry Ottele |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Douglas Whitney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aston Evaporative Services, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David R. Hammond |
| Represented By: | Terry R. Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
