United Western Bank v. Banc of America Funding Corporation et al
United Western Bank |
Banc of America Funding Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Banc of America Mortgage Securities, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley, RBS Acceptance Inc., RBS Securities, Inc. and RBS Holdings USA Inc. |
1:2014cv00418 |
February 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Philip A. Brimmer |
Michael J. Watanabe |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 10 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 281 ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/30/2020, re: 253 (248) Defendants' Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.(sphil, ) |
Filing 124 ORDER CONCERNING JOINT PRODUCTION PROTOCOL FOR ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND PAPER DOCUMENTS, entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/12/2015. (emill) |
Filing 103 ORDER. ORDERED that defendants Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC, Morgan Stanley, RBS Acceptance Inc., RBS Securities, Inc., and RBS Holdings USA Inc.'s Joint Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [Docket No. 77] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants motion is GRANTED as to the portion of plaintiff's first and second claims for relief that seek recovery for failure to disclose the existence of additional liens on the subject properties in certificates 2, 3, and 4. It is DENIED in all other respects by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 03/24/15.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 100 ORDER. ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Remand this Case to State Court [Docket No. 45] filed by plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is GRANTED in part. It is granted with respect to plaintiff's third, fourth, and fifth claims for relief. These claims are remanded to the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado, where they were filed as part of Case No. 2014CV30170. It is denied with respect to plaintiff's first and second claims for relief by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 02/24/15.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 73 ORDER. Ordered that Defendant Morgan Stanley's Motion to Enforce the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Automatic Stay and for a Protective Order Staying Discovery (docket no. 56) is GRANTED. Ordered that Defendants' Motion to Contin ue April 16, 2014 Scheduling Conference (docket no. 58) is GRANTED. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set on April 16, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED. Ordered that each party shall pay their own attorney fees and costs for this motion by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 04/15/14.(jhawk, ) |
Filing 72 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe: Motions Hearing held on 4/14/2014.Taking under advisement 56 Morgan Stanley's Motion to Enforce the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Automatic Stay and for a Protective Order Staying Discovery ; Holding in abeyance 58 Defendants' Motion to Continue April 16, 2014 Scheduling Conference. Court Reporter: FTR - Ellen E. Miller. FTR: Courtroom A502. (emill) |
Filing 69 MINUTE ORDER granting 67 Unopposed Motion for Leave to Appear by Telephone at April 14, 2014 Hearing, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/11/2014.(emill) |
Filing 25 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 4/16/2014 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/21/2014. (mjwcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.