Merrett v. Colorado Department of Public Safety, Colorado State Patrol
| Kisseva Merrett |
| Colorado Department of Public Safety and Colorado State Patrol |
| 1:2014cv00665 |
| March 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Alamosa |
| William J. Martinez |
| Craig B. Shaffer |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 45 the Parties Stipulated Motion to Dismiss WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear her or its own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/20/2014.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
32
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Telephonic Discovery Hearing held on 8/28/2014. ORDERED: Based on counsels representation, Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order 31 is DENIED as MOOT. The Plainti ff would like to extend the discovery cut-off for Phase I due to difficulties scheduling depositions. Once the Plaintiff has concrete dates for these depositions, counsel shall put together a telephone conference call with Magistrate Judge Shaffer at (303) 844-2117, to discuss these dates and the possibility of extending the deadline. FTR: Courtroom A-402. (amont)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 6/26/14. (cbssec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
