Navarrete v. Trani, et al
Ernesto Navarrete |
Travis Trani and Fernando Freiry |
1:2014cv00756 |
March 13, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Fremont |
Boyd N. Boland |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER dismissing this action without prejudice, and denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 7/21/14. No certificate of appealability shall issue. (dkals, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/17/14. (morti, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 03/27/14 re: 5 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 filed by Ernesto Navarrete, and 6 Tendered Document filed by Ernesto Navarrete, requesting Court appointed cou nsel. The Applicant has failed to submit a certified account statement showing the current balance in his inmate account, as he is required to do pursuant to the instructions stated at the bottom of Page Two of the § 1915 form. Applicant shall h ave thirty days from the date of this Minute Order to provide to the Court a certified account statement showing the current balance in his inmate account. Furthermore, the Court denies Plaintiffs request for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 6, as premature. (nmarb, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 03/15/14. (nmarb, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.