Gonzalez v. King Soopers Inc. et al
| Anthony L. Gonzalez |
| Raymond M. Deeny and King Soopers Inc. |
| 1:2014cv00773 |
| March 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| El Paso |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Labor/Management Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
FINAL JUDGMENT re: 23 Order, by Clerk on 10/10/14. (sgrim)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 9 Defendants' Amended Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Within thirty days from the date of this Order Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint that complies with this Order, the Federal Rules of Civil Proce dure, and this Courts Local Rules of Practice. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the Court-approved Complaint form. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint that complies with this Order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and this Courts Local Rules of Practice, within the time allowed, the court will dismiss this action with prejudice and enter judgment in favor of the defendants, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/24/14.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 6/12/2014 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Consent Form due by 6/12/2014, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/19/2014. (eseam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
